1/ Strictly speaking, the Iliad is not quite a realistic depiction of war (I mean, one-on-one combat? with lots of talking? not to mention the gods’ involvement?), but it is true and unrelenting in its representation of the horror and brutality of war.
“Aias Telamonios, Akhaian
bastion on defense, attacked and broke
a Trojan mass, showing his men the way,
by killing the best man of all the Thracians
Akamas, Eussoros’ brawny son.
He hit him on the forecrest, and the spearhead
dove his frontal bone, lodged in his brain,
filling his eyes with darkness.”
(Book 6)
(translated by Robert Fitzgerald)
Homer doesn’t shy away from violence.
“Seeing him tugging at the corpse, his flank
exposed beside the shield as he bent over,
Agenor with his spearshaft shod in bronze
hit him, and he crumpled. As he died
a bitter combat raged over his body
between the Trojan spearmen and Akhaians,
going for one another like wolves, like wolves
whirling upon each other, man to man.
Then Aias Telemonios knocked down
the son of Anthemion, Simoeisios,
in the full bloom of youth…”
(Book 4)
It is gruelling.
“A west wind rising
will cast a rippling roughness over water,
a shivering gloom on the dear sea. Just so
the seated mass of Trojans and Akhaians
rippled along the plain.”
(Book 7)
The gods may take sides, but Homer depicts the suffering on both sides:
“Bright Helios
had just begun to strike across the plowlands,
rising heavenward out of the deep
smooth-flowing Ocean stream, when these two groups
met on the battlefield, with difficulty
distinguishing the dead men, one by one.
With pails they washed the bloody filth away,
then hot tears fell, as into waiting carts
they lifted up their dead. All cries of mourning
Priam forbade them; sick at heart therefore
in silence they piled corpses on the pyre
and burned it down. Then back they went to Ilion.
Just so on their side the Akhaians piled
dead bodies on their pyre, sick at heart,
and burned it down…”
(ibid.)
And he doesn’t shy away from depicting the bloodlust of (some) Akhaians.
“Agamemnon in grim haste came by
to bar his mercy and cried:
“What now, soft heart?
Were you so kindly served at home by Trojans?
Why give a curse for them? Oh Menelaos,
once in our hands not one should squirm away
from death’s hard fall! No fugitive, not even
the manchild carried in a woman’s belly!
Let them all without distinction perish,
every last man of Ilion,
without a tear, without a trace!””
(Book 6)
2/ I know that the same characters from Greek mythology in different works of art are not necessarily the same—Odysseus from Homer’s epics is different from Odysseus in Sophocles’s Aias and Odysseus in Euripides’s Hecabe and Ulysses in Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida—but I suspect that when I reread Aeschylus’s Oresteia, my view of Agamemnon would be coloured by his cruelty in war and unreasonable behaviour towards Akhilleus (better known as Achilles) in the Iliad. He’s not exactly likeable, is he?
One of the great things about the Iliad is that Homer shows war to not only be about battle, about also about politics. The poem begins with a quarrel between Agamemnon and Akhilleus: Agamemnon, forced to return his war prize Kryseis, decides to take Akhilleus’s Briseis instead and humiliates him before the troops; Akhilleus then refuses to fight. The scene in Book 9, when Odysseus, Phoinix, and Aias come to Akhilleus as emissaries, is one of the greatest scenes in the book: the three men come to offer him gifts and an apology from Agamemnon and try—in three different ways—to persuade him to return and fight the Trojans; but Akhilleus continues to refuse.
“Why must Argives
fight the Trojans? Why did he raise an army
and lead it here? For Helen, was it not?
Are the Atreidai of all mortal men
the only ones who love their wives? I think not.
Every sane decent fellow loves his own
and cares for her, as in my heart I loved
Briseis, though I won her by the spear…”
(Book 9)
Why should he fight for a commander he doesn’t respect, who has humiliated him in front of everyone else? He goes further:
“Now I think
no riches can compare with being alive…”
(ibid.)
3/ Like War and Peace, the Iliad is not just one battle scene after another—there are also some domestic scenes. One of the most moving moments in the poem is when Hektor (or Hector) sees his wife Andromakhe (better known as Andromache) and their baby.
“As he said this, Hektor held out his arms
to take his baby. But the child squirmed round
on the nurse’s bosom and began to wail,
terrified by his father’s great war helm—
the flashing bronze, the crest with horsehair plume
tossed like a living thing at every nod.
His father began laughing, and his mother
laughed as well…”
(Book 6)
This is such a lovely moment (but heartbreaking when you think about what would later happen to them).
I have seen numerous heroic characters from the Trojan War/ the Iliad turned inside out and upside down in the Greek plays and in Shakespeare’s works and in other places, but never seen Hektor depicted as anything less than noble—even in Troilus and Cressida, Shakespeare’s most bitter and unpleasant play, Troilus is idealistic and foolish, Cressida is capricious and unfaithful, Paris and Helen are callous, Ulysses (Odysseus) is sly and cunning, Pandarus is a pimp, Patroclus (Patroklos) is “a masculine whore”, Ajax (Aias) is a fool, Thersites is deeply bitter and cynical, even Achilles is egoistic and despicable, but Hector is noble—the only noble, admirable character in Shakespeare’s play.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be not afraid, gentle readers! Share your thoughts!
(Make sure to save your text before hitting publish, in case your comment gets buried in the attic, never to be seen again).