3 blog entries
about Mary Crawford in "Mansfield park":
http://austensmansfield.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/sometimes-how-quick-to-feel/
http://austensmansfield.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/the-case-against-mary-crawford-part-i/
http://austensmansfield.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/the-case-against-mary-crawford-part-ii/
And 1 essay:
http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol21no1/kondelik.html
The good thing
about reading all of Jane Austen's novels, besides seeing her progress and
sharpened skills throughout her career, is that I read them with perspective
and can see them in relation to each other.
For example,
from "Northanger abbey" to "Sense and sensibility", if Jane
Austen doesn't deliberately mock the romance plot by letting Catherine Morland
fall in love with Henry Tilney, the right man, at 1st sight (which is a
possibility), she may see it as problematic and tackle the theme of wrong 1st
impressions in "Sense and sensibility" through Marianne Dashwood and
John Willoughby, and to her 3rd novel, may explore and develop it further, not
only in falling in love but in judgment of character in general, in "Pride
and prejudice".
Then, having
finished "Pride and prejudice", which she herself sees as
"light, bright and sparkling", Jane Austen produces a book that is
much more sombre and serious in tone. That is "Mansfield park". Here,
she chooses Fanny Price, an opposite of Elizabeth Bennet, as her heroine-
quiet, introspective, timid, passive, easily fatigued, and more shockingly, creates
a bad girl who is in many ways similar to Elizabeth Bennet- intelligent, witty,
charming, vivacious. Then she turns everything around, Mary is thoughtless,
self-centred, mercenary, frivolous, rather manipulative, and immoral.
If one reads
her books and thinks of the author more than the characters, this has great
significance. 1st, Mary Crawford's personality and character adds to the
complexity of "Mansfield park". 2nd, without quoting much of the
conversations between Mary and Edmund, Jane Austen's able to explain why Edmund
is charmed by and attracted to and in love with Mary. Readers like Mary, and in
many cases, become blind to her faults the same way Edmund is. This is done
masterfully like the way readers are made to see everything from Emma Woodhouse's
view in the following book. I also think that how a reader feels about Mary
Crawford reveals much about them. 3rd, Mary Crawford, in my opinion, is Jane
Austen's reaction to Elizabeth Bennet, or "Pride and prejudice" as a
whole, which shows that she's much more than a mere writer dealing with
romance, marriage and small talk.
For the time
being I haven't had a theory on how from "Mansfield park" Jane Austen
goes to "Emma", but placing "Emma" next to
"Persuasion" one can see that Lady Russell is quite similar to Emma
Woodhouse.
It should also
be noted that even though Jane Austen's characters are distinct individuals and
never repeated, there is 1 character in "Persuasion" reminiscent of
Elizabeth Bennet, Louisa Musgrove, and whilst I may be wrong, I can't help
thinking that perhaps Jane Austen has Elizabeth in mind when depicting Louisa,
as when conceiving the personality of Mary Crawford. Like Elizabeth and Mary,
Louisa is high-spirited, lively, charming, cheerful. More importantly,
Elizabeth is adored for her independence and strong-mindedness and
self-determination, 1st when she rejects Mr Collins, 2nd when she declines Mr
Darcy's 1st proposal, and 3rd when she refuses to give lady Catherine de Bourgh
a promise; these admirable qualities exist in Louisa but are taken to excess
and become stubbornness and recklessness (Jane Austen must have been thinking
of "the golden mean").
Anyhow, I'm
glad that "Pride and prejudice" was the last novel by Jane Austen I
read, that I'm not a huge fan of Elizabeth Bennet, that I'm not like the people who expect to find
Elizabeth Bennet in Jane Austen's other heroines, and that I don't need to like
the main characters in order to appreciate a novel.
Look at this,
for instance: http://www.pemberley.com/pemb/adaptations/persuasion/arc3/bbs16/16075
I have briefly
discussed how different Louisa is from Elizabeth, and will not say why Anne
Elliott is admirable or why I don't find Benwick insipid. All I'd like to say
is that I do not see Elizabeth as ideal, perfect, wonderful- she is in fact
prejudiced, judgmental, hasty, proud, sometimes impulsive. So when some haters
yell that Fanny Price is judgmental, I have no idea what they mean. Isn't
Elizabeth?
Update on 24/1:
http://frigatetoutopia.blogspot.no/2013/08/balancing-virtues-in-persuasion.html
"I have a theory that Austen made the heroines of her successive novels studies in contrast. Quiet Fanny follows sparkling Elizabeth, persuadable Anne follows confident Emma. According to Sarah Emsley, Anne is also a foil to Emma in truly possessing the "resources of mind and spirit... that Emma Woodhouse thinks she herself possesses" (Emsley, 145). Emsley also sees Persuasion as the most explicit of the six novels in balancing the virtues."
This is interesting, but the question remains, how does she go from "Mansfield park" to "Emma"?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be not afraid, gentle readers! Share your thoughts!
(Make sure to save your text before hitting publish, in case your comment gets buried in the attic, never to be seen again).