My essay in Eng1303 course at UiO:
In the third scene
of Stoppard’s Arcadia (up to Thomasina’s exclamation ‘I hope you die!’, Norton
Anthology p. 2907, Faber edn p. 54) many of the play’s key ideas regarding loss
and recovery (or rediscovery, or re-creation) are teasingly explored. Write an
essay on Stoppard’s dramatic investigation of these ideas, linking your reading
of the scene to the concerns of the play as a whole.
Love,
sex, mathematics, physics, thermodynamics, landscape design, Classicism versus
Romanticism, order versus disorder, thought versus feeling, reason versus
intuition, determinism and chaos theory, truth, knowledge, time... “Arcadia” is a fascinatingly complex,
thought-provoking and ‘chaotic’ play that, moving back and forth between
1809-1812 and the present- the 1990s, tackles many things at the same time. But
Tom Stoppard cleverly weaves all these themes and topics together, connecting
them all together, for a main theme that concerns and runs through the whole
play- loss and recovery, or rediscovery.
The characters in the play face physical loss, emotional
loss, intellectual loss. Burnings. Destructions. Deaths. The idea of loss and
recovery is expressed most explicitly in scene three. When Thomasina grieves
the loss of the hundreds or thousands of works in the library of Alexandria,
Septimus says:
“You should no more grieve for the
rest than for a buckle lost from your first shoe, or for your lesson book which
will be lost when you are old. We shed as we pick up, like travellers who must
carry everything in their arms, and what we let fall will be picked up by those
behind. The procession is very long and life is very short. We die on the
march. But there is nothing outside the march so nothing can be lost to it. The
missing plays of Sophocles will turn up piece by piece, or be written again in
another language. Ancient cures for diseases will reveal themselves once more.
Mathematical discoveries glimpsed and lost to view will have their time again.”
(Stoppard, 2907)
Septimus does not seem to be right. What is lost is lost.
Time is irreversible. Tea gets cold by itself but does not get hot by itself,
heat flows in one direction. Rice pudding cannot be unstirred, we cannot stir
things apart. Septimus’s thousands of sheets of paper get destroyed in a
bonfire. The three letters he burns disappear forever. The content of Lord
Byron’s letter as well as his reasons for leaving is never revealed.
Information gets lost. We can neither come back in time nor rewind past events.
The past is irretrievable. Most important of all, or at least to Septimus
himself, Thomasina dies in a fire and can never ‘recur’- Septimus loses her
forever.
It
can be said that his confidence on the recovery, or rediscovery, of things is
due to his belief in Newton’s laws of motion and determinism. Thomasina’s
realisation of the incompleteness of Newton’s laws in describing the world
causes Septimus to shift to what are later known as thermodynamics and chaos
theory. Septimus, from an ‘amoral’ witty young man who has several affairs with
the older women of the house, turns into a hermit and spends the rest of his
life working on Thomasina’s theories. Why he is driven to madness (that is, if
he really turns mad) is never exposed, but in my opinion, it is partly because
of his thirst for knowledge as well as his wish for finding a solution against
a gloomy future, but more because of his love for Thomasina, his feeling of
guilt and his realisation that her death is a true loss and she is gone
forever. One may assume that after this loss, Septimus’s confidence on recovery
also shatters.
However, Septimus’s idea is somehow supported throughout
the play. The events of the two periods take place in more or less the same
setting. Most noticeably, the names Coverly and Croom appear in both periods.
As the play “Arcadia” shuttles back
and forth between the present and the past, we can see repetitions,
recurrences, echoes and doubles. For example, Chloe, unlike Thomasina, is not a
genius who has ideas and theories far ahead of her time. But both of them are
fascinated by science. Both of them ponder over determinism and chaos and heat.
Thomasina asks Septimus “Am I the first person to have thought of this?” (Stoppard,
2884), Chloe asks Valentine “Do you think I’m the first person to think of
this?” (Stoppard, 2931) Valentine and Septimus are different, the former does
not possess the wittiness of the latter. But both Septimus and Valentine have a
tortoise, called Plautus and Lightning respectively. Both are in their twenties
at the time of the play. And they work on almost the same mathematical
problems. In both periods, a teacher has a relationship, or an affair, with the
daughter of the house- Septimus with Thomasina, and Bernard with Chloe. In both
periods, there is a negative review- Septimus’s review of Chater’s poems and
Bernard’s of Hannah’s book. And so on.
The
people from these two periods also talk about the same topics and ideas, such
as gardening and landscape and the change from Classical style to Romantic
style as well as the contrast between Classicism and Romanticism- logic and
intuition, thought and feeling, order and disorder. Lady Croom likes the garden
as it is, like an amiable picture of Arcadia, and dislikes Mr Noakes’s plan to
change it “... Where there is the familiar pastoral refinement of an
Englishman’s garden, here is an eruption of gloomy forest and towering crag, of
ruins where there was never a house, of water dashing against rocks where there
was neither spring nor a stone I could throw the length of a cricket pitch. My
hyacinth dell is become a haunt for hobgoblins, my Chinese bridge, which I am
assured is superior to the one at Kew, and for all I know at Peking, is usurped
by a fallen obelisk overgrown with briars...” (Stoppard, 2889) Hannah shares
the same opinion, saying “The whole Romantic shame, Bernard! [...] A century of
intellectual rigour turned in on itself. [...] There’s an engraving of Sidley
Park in 1730 that makes you want to weep. Paradise in the age of reason. By
1760 everything had gone- the topiary, pools and terraces, fountains, an avenue
of limes- the whole sublime geometry was ploughed under the Capability Brown...”
(Stoppard, 2900) Lady Croom stands for Classicism and order, Mr Noakes,
Romanticism and disorder or irregularity. Hannah stands for Classicism and logic,
Bernard, Romanticism and emotion, intuition.
Unlike
her mother Lady Croom, Thomasina supports the changes “In my opinion, Mr
Noakes’s scheme for the garden is perfect. It is a Salvator!” (Stoppard, 2888)
She embraces, and therefore embodies, innovation, change, development,
progress. Thomasina is also the person who realises the incompleteness of the
Newtonian system and comes up with ideas and theories of a new world view, a
new system. In fact, the change from Classicism to Romanticism in this play
goes together with the shift from Newtonian determinism and Euclidean geometry
to thermodynamics and chaos theory, and these changes are discussed in both periods.
For example, in scene one, Thomasina says “When you stir your rice pudding,
Septimus, the spoonful of jam spreads itself round making red trails like the
picture of a meteor in my astronomical atlas. But if you stir backward, the jam
will not come together again. Indeed, the pudding does not notice and continues
to turn pink as before.” (Stoppard, 2883) The observation of the
irreversibility of natural phenomena recurs in scene seven, when Valentine says
“Your tea gets cold by itself, it doesn’t get hot by itself... Heat goes to
cold. It’s a one-way street. Your tea will end up at room temperature.”
(Stoppard, 2935) Nearly two centuries apart, the characters in these two
periods discuss similar topics and ideas- determinism and chaos theory and the unpredictability
of nature and the second law of thermodynamics and the heat death of the
universe, especially in scene seven, when the actions take place concurrently
it appears as though the people from these two periods are talking about the
same things at the same time.
The
topic of sexual attraction with its effects or consequences is in both periods
as well. In scene six, Lady Croom says “It is a defect of God’s humour that he
directs our hearts everywhere but to those who have a right to them.” (Stoppard,
2930) This is echoed in the next scene when Chloe says “The universe is
deterministic all right, just like Newton said, it’s trying to be, but the only
thing going wrong is people fancying people who aren’t supposed in that part of
the plan.” (Stoppard, 2931) According to her Newton’s laws do not work and we
cannot predict the future because of sex, reminiscent of Thomasina saying
“Newton’s machine which would knock our atoms from cradle to grave by the laws
of motion is incomplete” (Stoppard, 2938) because of “the action of bodies in
heat” (Stoppard, 2939).
The
examples above are doubles, echoes, parallels. There are also recurrences. At the
end of scene two, Gus gives Hannah an apple with a leaf or two still attached.
This connects scene two to scene three, connects the present to the past. The
apple appears on the table at the beginning of scene three, which Septimus eats
and whose leaf Thomasina takes, intending to plot it and to deduce its
equation. The sound of a piano badly played in the background of scene three,
where Lady Croom talks about changes and disorder, recurs in scene four, where
Valentine explains to Hannah maths and the complexity of the real world. The
blurring of the past and the present is best shown in scene seven, where the actions
of the two periods run concurrently in the same setting. Moreover, as some
characters in the present day wear fancy dress for a party, they, to some
extent, look similar to the characters in 1812. Gus and Augustus, played by the
same actor in the play, look almost indistinguishable. In scene seven, Valentine
looks at Thomasina’s diagram of heat exchange and tells Hannah about the heat
death of the universe, and at the same time, we can see Septimus read
Thomasina’s essay and look at the same diagram and say “So, we are all doomed!”
(Stoppard, 2945) Thomasina gives Septimus her drawing of him and Plautus, which
later appears in the same scene when Gus gives it to Hannah. And in the end, we
can see two couples, from the past and the present, dancing. Thomasina and
Septimus. Hannah and Gus.
The
‘recurrences’ of these objects help the characters of the present solve the
mysteries of Sidley Park and find the answers to their questions. Letters burn
and information gets lost but eventually Hannah and Valentine are still able to
find out that Mr Chater the poet and Mr Chater the botanist are the same person
and he is not killed in a duel with Lord Byron. The drawing of Septimus and
Plautus remains so Hannah has evidence that Septimus is the hermit. Amidst chaos
order can still be found, the truth can be found. Things are not truly lost.
Furthermore,
although Thomasina’s premature death is a great loss, especially to Septimus,
there is some consolation, especially when we come close to the end of scene
seven.
“Septimus:
So, we are all doomed!
Thomasina:
(cheerfully) Yes.
[...]
Septimus:
So the Improved Newtonian Universe must cease and grow cold. Dear me.
Thomasina:
Yes, we must hurry if we are going to dance.
[...]
Septimus:
When we have found all the mysteries and lost all the meaning, we will be
alone, on an empty shore.
Thomasina:
Then we will dance. Is this a waltz?” (Stoppard, 2945- 2946)
Her
cheerful attitude, albeit seemingly contradicting and incomprehensible, can be
perceived in multiple ways. It may be the excitement of a nearly- seventeen-
year- old girl who is excited to learn how to waltz. It may be the pride in
discovering what her contemporaries have not thought of. Yet another
interpretation is that she accepts death. She accepts that everything will come
to an end, accepts that she, as well as everybody else, will die and therefore
should seize the day, live for the present and enjoy every moment. The title of
the play, “Arcadia”, comes from “Et
in Arcadia ego”, a phrase most commonly interpreted as a memento mori spoken by
Death. It is ironic that later that night Thomasina dies in a fire, but her
acceptance of human’s mortality may be a consolation, and at least she feels
happy and has a good time with Septimus before that unpredictable death. Her
death, thus, becomes less tragic.
On
the other hand, though Thomasina and Septimus do not succeed, their work is
“picked up by those behind”. It must be said that the notion of recovery or
discovery in the play, as used in this essay, is to be understood in a special
sense. In scene three, Septimus tells Thomasina to translate a text from Latin
into English, which turns out to be some lines by Shakespeare that he has
translated from English into Latin. Thomasina’s translation cannot be entirely
identical to Shakespeare’s original. Similarly Newton and Leibniz are both
credited with the invention of calculus, but they arrived at their results
differently. There are variations. But in a way, things recur, as Septimus
says. A particular concept or idea emerges periodically under the form of
multiple artistic expressions. All that was lost will eventually turn up again.
Thomasina dies, but Hannah has her notebooks, Valentine repeats and further
develops Thomasina’s iteration with the help of computers and Chloe comes up
with similar ideas about determinism and chaos. In scene five, Valentine says
“who wrote what when” is “trivial”, explaining “The questions you’re asking
don’t matter, you see. It’s like arguing who got there first with the calculus.
The English say Newton, the Germans say Leibnitz. But it doesn’t matter.
Personalities. What matters is the calculus. Scientific progress. Knowledge.” (Stoppard,
2922) That is in fact similar to Septimus’s thought “The missing plays of
Sophocles will turn up piece by piece, or be written again in another language.
Ancient cures for diseases will reveal themselves once more. Mathematical
discoveries glimpsed and lost to view will have their time again.” (Stoppard,
2907) If Newton had not invented calculus or if he had lost the paper, we would
still have calculus today thanks to Leibnitz. Therefore, if we look at life
this way, nothing is truly lost.
“Arcadia”,
in my opinion, supports the view of the cyclical flow of history. Firstly, the
structure of the play is full of repetitions, echoes, parallels and doubles.
Secondly, Thomasina’s “mathematical discoveries glimpsed and lost to view... have
their time again” years later. Thirdly, “the pessimistic prospect of the
extinction of the universe posited by the law of entropy, which destroys
Septimus's faith in the Newtonian system is counterbalanced by the implications
of Thomasina's other genial intuition, chaos theory, since this form of
mathematics allows us to discover the equations governing the shapes of nature,
and therefore, as Valentine puts it, to know "how [this universe] started,
[and] perhaps... how the next one will come”.” (Rallo)
Bibliography
Antakyalioglu,
Zekiye. "Chaos Theory and Stoppard's Arcadia", http://www.iku.edu.tr/TR/iku_gunce/GunceC3S2veS3FenMuh/Gunce/GunceC4S3Ekim06FenMuh/87.pdf
“Arcadia
(Play)”. Wikipedia: The Free
Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arcadia_(play)
“Et
in Arcadia ego”, Wikipedia: The Free
Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_in_Arcadia_ego
Hari,
Johann. “Is Tom Stoppard's Arcadia the greatest play of our age?”, The Independent, 2009, http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/features/is-tom-stoppards-arcadia-the-greatest-play-of-our-age-1688852.html
Rallo,
Carmen Lara. “The past will have its time again”, http://www.publicacions.ub.edu/revistes/bells15/documentos/78.pdf
Stoppard,
Tom. “Arcadia”. In The Norton Anthology of English Literature- Volume 2, edited by
Julia Reidhead, 2880- 2948. United States of America: W. W. Norton&
Company, Inc, 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be not afraid, gentle readers! Share your thoughts!
(Make sure to save your text before hitting publish, in case your comment gets buried in the attic, never to be seen again).