1/ The play begins with an elopement between the poor Leantio and the rich Bianca. The scene that follows has one of Shakespeare’s favourite themes: forced marriage. Fabritio wants his daughter Isabella to marry a rich fool, simply called the Ward in the play. He says to Guardiano, the Ward’s guardian that “she shall love him.”
How absurd. Isabella’s aunt Livia has to speak up:
“LIVIA I must offend you then, if truth will do’t,
And take my niece’s part, and call’t injustice
To force her love to one she never saw.
Maids should both see and like; all little enough;
If they love truly after that, ’tis well.
Counting the time, she takes one man till death,
That’s a hard task, I tell you…”
(Act 1 scene 2)
These lines are more interesting:
“LIVIA O soft there, brother! Though you be a Justice,
Your warrant cannot be serv’d out of your liberty;
You may compel out of the power of a father
Things merely harsh to a maid’s flesh and blood;
But when you come to love, there the soil alters;
Y’are in another country, where your laws
Are no more set by than the cacklings
Of geese in Rome’s great Capitol.”
(ibid.)
Thomas Middleton immediately subverts your expectation however. You think it’s probably going to be similar to Shakespeare’s treatment of the forced marriage vs love marriage theme, you assume Livia to be a progressive woman who stands against tyrannical fathers, but no, the story goes in another direction—Hippolito, brother of Fabritio, has incestuous feelings for Isabella, and Livia helps bring them together!—how can Isabella know and why does she believe right away that Livia is telling the truth, that she’s the product of an affair and therefore not related by blood to them?
Having done that, Livia manipulates Leantio’s mother and brings Bianca to the Duke. You think that Jane Austen’s Emma meddles in people’s lives and turns everything upside down just out of idleness? Just look at Livia—this woman needs a hobby.
2/ Generally, I don’t think the poetry is anywhere near as good as in The Revenger’s Tragedy (long attributed to Cyril Tourneur, now sometimes attributed to Middleton but not definitively), but once in a while, there’s some interesting imagery:
“GUARDIANO […] it’s a witty age,
Never were finer snares for women’s honesties
Than are devis’d in these days; no spider’s webs
Made of a daintier thread than are now practis’d
To catch love’s flesh-fly by the silver wing…”
(Act 2 scene 2)
He brings Bianca to the Duke for his own advancement. Why does Livia? Probably just because she can.
“LIVIA […] ’Tis but want of use;
Her tender modesty is sea-sick a little,
Being not accustom’d to the breaking billow
Of woman’s wavering faith, blown with temptations.
’Tis but a qualm of honour, ’twill away;
A little bitter for the time, but lasts not.
Sin tastes at the first draught like wormwood water,
But, drunk again, ’tis nectar ever after.”
(ibid.)
3/ I can’t help noticing that most of the non-Shakespearean plays I’ve read from 1580s-1630s present a much darker, more cynical view of humanity and make me feel disgusted with the characters. Only a couple of Shakespeare’s plays have a similar effect, such as The Merchant of Venice or Troilus and Cressida; the majority give one the impression that he loves people and loves humanity. The others—Thomas Kyd, Christopher Marlowe, John Webster, John Ford, Thomas Middleton—depict a rotten world in which human beings are bestial and repulsive. There’s not enough light, so to speak. The bad are monstrous and numerous, the good get destroyed.
In Women Beware Women, Fabritio forces his own daughter Isabella to marry an idiot for money and advancement; her aunt Livia tells her a false tale and Isabella has an incestuous affair with her own uncle Hippolito but carries on with her marriage to the Ward; Livia again acts as a bawd, bringing Bianca to the Duke; Bianca, having “forsook friends, fortunes, and [her] country” in order to marry the poor Leantio, now cheats on him and changes her tune, insults the husband’s family for their poverty and brazenly becomes the Duke’s mistress; the Duke is a bastard who covets someone else’s wife, but Leantio isn’t a good man either, as he more or less imprisoned Bianca in the house because “The jewel is cas’d up from all mens’ eyes”; Leantio later also has an affair with Livia; and the play ends with a bloody party (perhaps inspired by The Spanish Tragedy).
The final scene is spectacular.
“HIPPOLITO […] Vengeance met Vengeance,
Like a set match, as if the plague of sin
Had been agreed to meet here altogether…”
(Act 5 scene 2)
Livia is a striking character, a psychopath, one of the most villainous women I have come across in fiction—the other characters in the play commit sin because of lust or greed—Livia does all these things just because she can.
Funnily enough:
“BIANCA […] O the deadly snares
That women set for women, without pity
Either to soul or honour! Learn by me
To know your foes. In this belief I die:
Like our own sex, we have no enemy, no enemy!”
(ibid.)
I mean, sure, Livia ensnares Isabella and Bianca, but do they not have agency? Do they not have free will? Nobody forces them to have an affair and deceive others.
Everybody in the play, except for the Lord Cardinal, is rotten to the core. The character of Livia is fascinating and memorable, but it’s a repulsive play.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be not afraid, gentle readers! Share your thoughts!
(Make sure to save your text before hitting publish, in case your comment gets buried in the attic, never to be seen again).