In September, I read Moments of Reprieve, my third Primo Levi book after If This Is a Man (aka Survival in Auschwitz) and The Truce (aka The Reawakening). Wonderful writer. Primo Levi writes about the people he knew at Auschwitz—the moments of reprieve—he’s got a gift for portraiture and for images. Certain images get imprinted on one’s mind: a man playing the violin in the camp (at which point the listeners, for a brief moment, have a vision of a better world), the guided tour for Hitlerjugend, the “revenge” of the inmates through “bacteriological warfare”, etc.
The last chapter, about Rumkowski, is thought-provoking.
The most moving chapter in the book is the one about Lorenzo, which is reminiscent of Vasily Grossman’s idea in Life and Fate about “senseless kindness”. Among my favourite writers, I especially like the temperament of Vasily Grossman and Primo Levi, men who have seen some of the worst horrors of the 20th century and yet still believe in salvation and goodness.
(Today marks one year since the Simchat Torah Massacre, or the October 7 atrocities).
________________________________________
Is Flannery O’Connor the best writer of bigotry? She must at least be one of the best at depicting and dissecting it.
In October, I read “Everything that Rises Must Converge” and “Greenleaf” from her second short story collection, but I’m also thinking of “The Artificial Nigger” and “The Displaced Person” from A Good Man Is Hard to Find and Other Stories. There’s something cold, uncompromising, even harsh about Flannery O’Connor, but she is so good, so striking—she hits you right in the face. Some writers (Tolstoy, Chekhov, Cao Xueqin, Carson McCullers…) depict their characters with love and compassion; some others (Flannery O’Connor, Flaubert, Ibsen…) dissect them.
Over the past 2 years or so, I’ve discovered a few short story writers: Isaac Bashevis Singer, Isaac Babel, Alice Munro, etc. and Flannery O’Connor is the most striking one, much more interesting than Alice Munro. She’s got a distinct voice, she picks strong images, and her stories are “the axe for the frozen see within us.”
________________________________________
Speaking of “the axe, etc.”, I went to the Kafka exhibition in Oxford. Finally got to see the original manuscripts and drawings!
Last year, on my work trip to Prague, I visited the Kafka Museum and realised, in disappointment, that most of the originals were in Oxford or in Germany.
________________________________________
I read and gave up, nearly halfway through, on Pamela. How many times is the wench going to faint? And she goes on and on and on about her virtue.
Is there a Richardson vs Fielding split (like Tolstoy vs Dostoyevsky)? I seem to be Team Fielding. I know I cannot say till I’ve read Tom Jones and Clarissa, but Shamela is a hoot, and I’m now having a blast with Joseph Andrews.
Funnily enough, I’ve noted that both of these works are spin-offs from Pamela, but Joseph Andrews accompanies Pamela rather than Shamela.
Speaking of Primo Levi and Vassily Grossman, have you ever read Viktor Frankl? One need not subscribe to his notion of a human will to meaning (though it isn’t a bad way to think about things) to recognize his deep humanity. Like the other examples you give, he survived the worst humanity has to give (Auschwitz), and came out with a deeply humane and gentle philosophy about life.
ReplyDeleteNo, I haven't. Which books do you recommend?
DeleteMan’s Search for Meaning.
DeleteI'm not surprised that you gave up reading Pamela. I found myself, in pre-internet days, stuck in a country house with nothing else to read, so I read it. Back in the wider world I read Shamela and most of Fielding. Reading Tom Jones, for the first time, was a delight.
ReplyDeleteTeam Fielding for sure! When you asked was it worth finishing Pamela, I couldn't answer because I never made it through. Probably about halfway myself.
ReplyDeleteTom Jones is a real treat.
Midsummer Reading and Reese,
ReplyDeleteHahahha I see.
(Didn't reply earlier as I was in Berlin).